New Choice Emerges For Cordell Hull, Central Solutions

A new least pricey situation has actually emerged under which the Cordell Hull Building might be remodelled and Central Solutions torn down as the state weighs its choices for those workplace buildings.

The brand-new option would cost around $95 million and showcases a new parking garage with approximately 150 spaces where the Central Services building sits now, stated Bob Oglesby, commissioner of the states Department of General Solutions, on Monday.

Oglesbys company prepares to present the new alternative to the State Structure Commission on Aug. 14.

The plan is based upon consultant Centric Architectures latest report suggesting that the two state workplace buildings be thought about independently since of differences between them. The report also found that it would be most affordable to remodel Cordell Hull than to tear it down and restore.

The expense of remodeling Central Services is higher per square foot than for Cordell Hull, but the capacity for Cordell Hull is higher than Central Services, Oglesby stated at the briefing.

A preliminary review by specialist JLL suggested taking down Cordell Hull and Central Services because that would have been less pricey than to refurbish the buildings.

Those calculations were based on an assumption that the structures would be offered at completion of their beneficial life. Centrics brand-new suggestion assumes that those buildings wouldnt be offered at that point.

Oglesby provided approximated expenses of numerous other situations. The costliest choice involved destroying both Cordell Hull and Central Services and building once more– $191 million for higher-quality space costing $350 per square foot and $151 million for standard area costing around $250 a square foot.

Refurbishing and occupying both structures will cost $109 million. Demolishing and occupying leased area in privately possessed buildings would cost $121 million and leave an uninhabited building site adjacent to the states Capitol for future use.

One situation now off the table is selling the Cordell and Hull and Central Solutions sites then renting the home back.

Whichever means the state goes, funding would still be required for any new building to be constructed or for renovations to take place.

Reach Getahn Ward at 615-726-5968 and on Twitter @ Getahn.

Environment-friendly Twp. Locations Safety Services Levy On Fall Tally

ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY TWP. – Voters here will certainly deal with a tax levy on the November ballot.

The Eco-friendly Township board of trustees voted unanimously July 14 to put a 2.95-mill, constant security services levy on the fall ballot.

“It’s unfortunate, however we need to do something,” Trustee David Linnenberg stated at Monday’s meeting. “The loss in the localcity government fund, estate tax and concrete personal home tax has actually been frustrating to us.”

The town has lost approximately $3.4 million in yearly revenue due to state financing cuts, which, in addition to the cuts Linnenberg referenced, also includes the removal of the general public utility tax.

Environment-friendly Town Administrator Kevin Celarek stated the money the town lost impacts the township’s ability to utilize basic fund money to helpto assist support cops and fire services.

He said the township is designating about $1.7 million from the basic fund to the cops department this year, and about $1.4 million to the fire department.

If authorized, the levy would produce about $3.16 million each year for town authorities and fire services. It’s approximated the levy would cost the owner of a home worth $100,000 an extra $103 per year in taxes.

Asking voters to think about a security services levy was the suggestion of the Environment-friendly Township Financial Evaluation Committee, a group of 12 township residents who fulfilled this spring to examine the town’s financial resources and testimonial levels of service. The committee advised a levy to make up for the loss of revenue from state cuts and to increase security in the town.

“To me, the No. 1 concern is our security services,” Trustee Triffon Callos said. “We require to keep an eye out for our residents.”

Cash created by the levy would enable the town to include a seventh cops beat to strengthen its borders with neighboring neighborhoods, and also offer the fire department the capability to phase in the addition of a 2nd fire and EMS staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week at the department’s head office station on Harrison Avenue.

“My No. 1 concern is the seventh police beat,” Linnenberg stated. “I believe we have to have a seventh police beat at all times.”

He said Environment-friendly Town is a safe neighborhood, however the police department is seeing troubles related to crime in border neighborhoods like Westwood, Price Hill and Colerain Town.

Both Callos and Trustee Tony Rosiello concurred it’s important is essential for the township to be proactive in regard to crime and security rather than responsive.

“We have to be in a position to act, securing our citizens and securing our home values,” Rosiello said. “It would be much tougher to come back in a year or twoor more and respond to exactly what’s going on.”

Celarek said the total variety of ask for cops service has held steady over the previous few years, with a range of about 31,000 calls to 33,000 calls each year, however he said the complexity and complications included in calls is getting worseworsening due to the fact that of issues in neighboring neighborhoods.

Some of the more prevalent crimes officers are reactingreacting to consist of theft, break-in, breaking and getting in and burglary.

Although the financial evaluation committee recommended the levy be a five-year levy, Linnenberg and Callos made the case for placing a constant levy on the tally.

“I think if we’re going to do this levy it must be a continuing levy,” Linnenberg said. “We are going to need this money going ahead. Even if 8 years from now Ohio has a $400 billion rainy day fund and begins giving cashrefund, we’re going to need this money.”

Callos added, “There are things that are out of our control at the state level. We can’t forecast exactly what’s going to happen down the line.”

Rosiello contacted locals for their support.

“We’re going to certainly require your assistance and your trust to assist us move ordeals forward,” he said. “We desire you to continue to be in Eco-friendly Town for a very long time and we desire it to be a safe neighborhood.”

PAX Global Technology Announces Authorities Recognition As Shenzhen Municipal …

xxxxx

–)

[For Immediate Release]

PAX Global Technology
Announces Official Acknowledgment as
Shenzhen Municipal-level Venture Innovation Center

(Hong Kong, PRC and Singapore, 14 July 2014) PAX Global Innovation Limited (PAX or the Company, together with its subsidiaries collectively knownreferred to as the Group, HKSE stock code: 00327. HK), the leading Electronic Funds Transfer Point-of-Sale Terminal (E-payment Terminal) Solutions Supplier in China, is delighted to announce PAX Computer Innovation (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (Pax Computer), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PAX, has actually been successfully acknowledged as a 2013 Shenzhen Municipal-level Venture Innovation Center.

In order to promote the development of enterprise technology centers, the Shenzhen municipal government picked the most exceptional ventures that certify with outstanding development capacities, substantial innovation performances and strong market leadership to be recognized as Shenzhen Municipal Venture Innovation Centers. Qualified business can enjoy government grants so as to motivate them to enhance their abilities in the area of independent development.

PAXs market standing and its strong RD capabilities are the main reasons for making this recognition. This considerable recognition acts as support to advance PAXs future technology and innovation development, which will most certainly assist additionally boost its technological innovation capability and enhance core competitiveness. On the other hand, PAX will regularly aim to offer remarkable quality terminals and services to its clients.

~ End ~

About PAX Global Technology Limited (www.paxglobal.com.hk)
PAX Global Innovation Limited (Stock Code: 00327. HK) is an electronic funds transfer point-of-sale terminal (E-payment Terminal) option services providerproviders. PAX is mainly engaged in the development and sale of E-payment Terminal products and the provision of solution services. PAX Global was noted on the main board of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited on 20 December 2010. The Group currently collaborates with over 80 partners worldwide on E-payment Terminal options.

The Company is a leading E-payment Terminal options carrier in China. According to The Nilson Report June 2014 Concern– the worlds leading source of news and study on customer payment systems– PAX Global ranked # 3 around the world by shipping volume of E-payment Terminals in 2013. Sales of our E-payment Terminal items reached over six million systems and are offered to even more than 80 countries and regions, consisting of the United States, Singapore, Taiwan, Brazil, India, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, EMEA and Central Asia.

About PAX Computer Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (http://www.paxsz.com)
PAX Computer system Innovation (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (Pax Computer) – was founded in July 2001, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PAX Global Innovation Limited (stock code 00327. HK), a Hong Kong noted company. Pax Computer is a nationwide modern venture, specializing in RD, production, sales and relevant services of electronic funds move point-of-sale terminal (E-payment Terminal), along with providing a complete range of electronic payment solutions.

Source: PAX Global Technology Limited

PRIOR TO THE CROSSFamily Life: Relationships Shape Our Entire Life

As we get in into the heart (and the heat!) of the St. Louis summer season, when many of us spend some additional time with our families, I really want to mirror with you on familydomesticity.

I suggest that we begin with whats right in front of us at this time of year: July 4– Independence Day.

Although we commemorate our independence as a country, its remarkable how dependent we are on relationships. Think about it: Were born out of a relationship (our mom and dad), and born into relationships (our extended household). Those relationships shape our identity. In the first location, they shape our identification in a psychological sense: our moms and dads and brothers and sis and grandparents and aunties and uncles shape our character as we mature. In the second location, they form our identity in a metaphysical sense: we will eternally be child or child, brother or sister, grand son or granddaughter, nephew or niece and so on. Relationships are inescapable. We wouldnt even exist apart from relationships, and we wouldnt be who we are apart from relationships. During that sense, we are born and live and die as drastically reliant animals.

All that raises a concern: Why would God make us that method?

Our faith in the Trinity offers the clearest and most convincing response to why relationships and reliance are at the heart of our presence. The Dad, Kid and Spirit are who they are because of their relations with each other. Believe about it: 1) Jesus, the Kid, would not be who He is apart from the Daddy. That eternal fact is clear at every minute of Jesus earthly life and ministry. 2) The Holy Spirit would not be the Holy Spirit apart from the Father and the Kid. Thats why the Papa and the Boy together send out the Spirit into the world. 3) Even the Father would not be Dad apart from the Kid and the Spirit. Without them, He wouldnt be Dad. He would just be Alone.

At the heart of God is a set of relationships, and the identity of each magnificent individual relies on those relationships. Given that were made in the image and similarity of God, relations also define us as human individuals.

What does that mean for us? How should Trinitarian faith shape our thoughts and actions? It indicates that we are most human not in our independence however precisely in our dependence on relationships. When we make time to promote those relations and purposely cultivate them– as numerous people do in the summertime days– we get a little taste of heaven. Its great to be together, even with relatives who drive us a little crazy. Its a little taste of heaven since we are cultivating our similarity to God.

By contrast, when we ignore those relations– and cultivate our independence, in the sense of being alone– we commonly discover a sense of desolation. Thats since were moving far from our likeness to God.

As we bask in the radiance of our independence as a nation, lets be careful not to give in to the idea that self-reliance is the source of human prospering– exactly what I would call the myth of independence. Our countries independence is a historical reality that we can and ought to commemorate. The misconception of self-reliance is contrary to our faith, contrary to real human growing and– lets face it– would steal among the terrific happiness of summer season: time spent together as household.

Archbishop Robert J. Carlsons calendar

Monday, July 14

1:30 pm Welcome address, National Association of Pastoral Musicians at the Americas Center

Wednesday, July 16

10 am Satisfying with Theresa Ruzicka, president of Catholic Charities of St. Louis at the archbishops home

Thursday, July 17

8 pm Mass, National Association of Pastoral Musicians at the Americas Center

Friday, July 18

10 am Priest Day at the archbishops home

7 pm Franciscan Federation Third Order Routine Conference Welcome at Sheraton Westport – Lakeside Chalet

Saturday, July 19

10 am Profession of pledges and reception with Enthusiasts of the Holy Cross at Resurrection Parish in south St. Louis

5 pm Humanae Vitae Mass at the Cathedral Basilica of St. Louis

Bishop Edward M. Rices calendar

Monday, July 14

11:45 am Mass, Cardinal Rigali Center

Tuesday, July 15

11 am Meeting with Dr. Kurt Nelson, new superintendent of Catholic Education, Cardinal Rigali Center

11:45 am Mass, Cardinal Rigali Center

Wednesday, July 16

11 am Mass for Catholic Experience Week, S-F Scout Camp, Farmington

Thursday, July 17, through Sunday, July 20

Steubenville Mid-America Conference in Springfield, Mo.

. Sunday, July 20

8 pm Closing Mass for Novena at Carmelite Abbey

Bogus Claims About Property Tax Increases Are For Political Gain

A lie gets halfway worldwide before the reality has a possibility to get its trousers on.

That quote from Winston Churchill gets to the core of the one of the more major problems in Kansas today. Taxes, budget plans and student achievement are importantare essential problems however to a relatively wonderful level they are symptoms of even more insidious troubles. And that is one facet of what’s really the matter with Kansas: incorrect claims are made use of for political gain and prevent civil conversations of genuine troubles and options.

Many of these false claims might be exposed rather easily by media if they so desired, but lots of editorial boards, editors and even a reasonable variety of reporters these days don’t trouble; others just don’t want the realities to get in the method of what they want people to hear. (FYI, I have actually experienced this from the within; prior to signing up with KPI I invested twenty years handling television stations and dealt with a great deal of reporters and news directors.)

A good example is the bogus however frequently duplicated claim that earnings tax reform is the cause of home tax increases. KPI researchers initially analyzed this claim a number of years ago when it surfaced as an anticipated result of tax reform, as in ‘lowering state taxes will compel local taxes to increase.’ We collected per-capita taxes of the nine states that do not tax income and found that they really had lower state and local taxes per-capita than the states which tax income.

Last winter, regional media composed how terrible it was that 85 counties enhanced home taxes in 2013, again criticisming earnings tax reform. I called editorial authors at the Kansas City Star and the Hutchinson Information to ask if they would share their research and both confessed that they didn’t understand the source of the info! That would have produced a great “harrumph” from Sir Winston.

We lastly tracked the information to Senator Anthony Hensley. He was best about the variety of counties that increased taxes in 2013 but he overlooked to point out that 85 counties increasing property tax is about as remarkable as the wind blowing in Kansas. Undoubtedly, the average for the years 1998 with 2013 is 86 counties! I question how many lawmakers who are expressing (counterfeit) outrage over 2013 propertyreal estate tax increases did so in 2003, when 95 counties enhanced homereal estate tax … or 2005 when 92 counties had increases … and even 2006 when 95 counties enhanced homereal estate tax. Their outrage has nothing to do with propertyreal estate tax; it’s simply political posturing. And very darn hypocritical.

Earlier this year we welcomed all 105 counties to get involved in a survey so we might comprehend why they enhanced homereal estate tax in 2013. Just 7 reacted and none pointed out earnings tax reform as their factor. Exactly what about the other seventy-eight counties that enhanced taxes? Why would they not take the chance to blame tax reform? I wonder if it is since we asked them to document any such claim by referencing state budget cuts for regionalcity government; we likewise notified them that previous state budget director Steve Anderson was standing by to verify such claims.

The newestThe most recent effort to trick residents comes from retired Wichita State University professor Ed Flentje, whose claims were published last week in several Kansas papers. His standard property is “A” took place (local propertyreal estate tax enhanced) and “B” occurred (earnings tax reform), therefore “A” caused “B.” This is a traditional non-sequitur, which Merriam-Webster’s dictionary specifies as, “(1) an inference that does not follow from the premises; specifically: a fallacy resulting from a simple conversion of a universal affirmative recommendation or from the transposition of a condition and its following; (2): a statement (as a feedback) that does not follow logically from or is not clearly connected to anything previously said.”

I wrote to Mr. Flentje twice last week requesting his information and any documents to support his claim; both times he said we would supply the data but neglected my request for paperwork. So I wrote to him a 3rd time and stated that unless I heard otherwise I would report that he has no paperwork. I doing this now.

Now let’s look at how he misleads with information.

Flentje: “PropertyReal estate tax are on track to enhance by more than $400 million statewide throughout Gov. Sam Brownback’s term in office.”

Fact: Flentje acknowledges that he bases this on the reality that home taxes enhanced about $300 million over the last three years and he is presuming another $100 million increase. Let’s state he’s best. A $400 million boost would total up to 11 % over four years (all home taxes without charge per KDOR). By contrast, property taxes increased $767 million and 29 % throughout Gov. Sebelius’ first term. (FYI, inflation was pretty similar.) I wonder if Mr. Flentje, Senator Hensley and media freely slammed Gov. Sebelius for exactly what, by their reasoning, must have been far even worse policy?

The very first table nearby to this post reveals the actual boosts for school districts, counties and cities of the first course. The substance yearly growth rate (CAGR) for school districts under Gov. Sebelius was 6.0 % and inflation was 2.7 %. Given that 2010, the annual boost for school districts was 1.2 % … a complete portion point below inflation.

Under Sebelius, counties’ CAGR for taxes and inflation was 5.9 % and 2.7 %, respectively; under Brownback, 3.3 % and 2.2 %. Tax boosts for huge cities were likewise higher under Sebelius.

Does that in and of itself mean that Gov. Brownback’s policies are much better than Gov. Sebelius? Obviously not; I’m just showing the dreadful imperfections and hypocrisy of Flentje’s and others’ reasoning.

Flentje: PropertyReal estate tax boosts are disproportionally influencing rural counties (his meaning of rural is all counties other than Johnson, Sedgwick, Wyandotte, Shawnee and Douglas).

Reality: Historically, there commonly are swings in between the rate of boost for urban and rural counties. Right here we examined the individual information for counties and school districts. KSDE provided USD tax information for 2001 through 2013 and KDOR provided county-only taxes for 1997 with 2013. Districts in rural counties had higher boosts in two of the last 3 years but they likewise had higher boosts in 2007, 2009 and 2010. Tax increases for rural county governments did grow faster than urban counties over the last 3 years but once again, history reveals that to be rather common. In between 1997 and 2013, there were 8 years when rural counties had higher increases and 8 years when urban counties had greater boosts.

Is it possible that something else might be causing local home taxes to increase? Like mindful decisions to spend even more? USD tax boosts in rural counties were bigger than metropolitan counties in 2012 and 2013; rural districts increased spending per-pupil by 5.6 % those 2 years while spending in metropolitan districts’ spending enhanced simply 2.6 %. The more that government invests, the even more it will tax.

By the means, KSDE data reveals that per-pupil spending in rural districts was $13,153 in 2013; urban districts averaged $12,427.

Flentje: “State legislators have actually made the regional problem even worse by removing local income sources, besides the propertyreal estate tax.”

Fact: RegionalCity governments do have other earnings sources. Flentje could be describing the mortgage registration tax that is being phased out over the next 5 years, but that hasn’t even entered into result yet. Or maybe he is referring to the 2004 removal of state money provided to regional governments from the Regional Advertisement Valorem Tax Relief Fund (LAVTRF) and City-County Profits Sharing (CCRS). The concept behind LAVTRF in particular is that offering State General Fund money to regional government will certainly decrease local property taxes, however once again, the information reveals otherwise.

Click the second photo and you will certainly see that counties’ and big cities’ CAGR for tax boosts was 3 times the rate of inflation – 6.8 % vs. 2.2 % – over the last six years for which LAVTRF and CCRS were in place. If the logic holds, removing them would have given increase to even greater tax increases but that’s not exactly what took place. Over the next 6 years, the CAGR for county and big city tax boosts dropped to 4.7 % and 3.6 %, respectively, while inflation was 2.3 %. Cities and counties took that cash from the State General Fund and still raised taxes.

So what are some lawmakers requiring now? Taking cash from the State General Fund and providing it to cities and counties so they can act to be supporting property tax reform. Why do I say ‘act’? Because they are a few of the very same legislators who voted versus requiring local chosen officials to vote on the quantity of property tax increases (HB 2047) and fixing atrocities committed by the Court of Tax Appeals (HB 2643).

Word to the wise: constantly ask for full documentation and do your research so you can make fully-informed decisions.

Family Life: Discussions Now Can Save Household Relationships Later On

By Chelsey Byers/University of Illinois Extension

One of the most asked for programs that I teach to various groups in our community is called Who Gets Grandmas Yellow Pie Plate. This program elicits great conversation amongst the individuals, as many have an individual story to share.

Almost everyone has individual possessions such as a family treasure, china or something as simple as a yellow pie plate with meaning for them and for other household members. Exactly what takes place to your individual belongings when you die? Who decides who gets what? How can these decisions be made throughout your life time?

Planning for the transfer of personal items is a difficulty for the owner and, possibly, householdrelative and legal representatives who are delegated make choicesdeciding when a householda relative passes away.

The issue of who receives the personal homepersonal effects is often ignored till a situation happens. Numerous households assume it isn’t essential, or it will just look after itself. However, experiences of householdmember of the family and their lawyers suggest otherwise. Moving non-titled property is a concern that affects individuals no matter monetary worth, heritage or cultural background.

There are no magic solutions for transferring property, however there are some important factors to think about.

Comprehend the level of sensitivity of the concerns. Decisions about individual property involve taking care of the emotions linked to objects gathered over a lifetime or throughout generations. It is commonly the emotional value connectedconnected to personal belongings that makes the transfer problem so challenging.

Choose what is to be accomplished. A vitalA fundamental part of dispersing personal propertypersonal effects is setting objectives and agreeing on exactly what is to be accomplished. The transfer method you select could vary relying on the goals you determine.

Decide exactly what fair means in your family. Numerous individualsMany individuals will certainly say they desire to be reasonable to all members of their household; however, fair might have many different interpretations. For some, it suggests everyone is dealt with similarly with everyone getting the same. For others, it means everyone is treated equitably or gets something, taking into consideration differences amongst householdmember of the family. Individuals often think that something is unreasonable when the rules they believe to be vital aren’t followed. Misconceptions and hurt feelings result when family members fail to discover exactly what others consider to be fair.

Identify the significance of objects. Special belongings are meaningful to individual householdrelative in various means. For that reason, a vital step in making decisionsdeciding about moving non-titled home is to make a list of unique objects. Include on this list the meaning attached to each item, exactly what makes that product special and who ought to get each product and why. Lots of moms and dads selectopt to collect details from their children, grandchildren, or others prior to deciding exactly what to pass on to whom.

Recognize circulation alternatives and repercussions. Families utilize a range of techniques to distribute non-titled property. No method is ideal for all families. From the start, it is crucialis very important that the individuals involved discuss, recognize and agree upon a method or approaches of transfer. While families need to be creative as they seek solutions, they also require to be conscious of state laws regulating the transfer of non-titled home and work within the legal standards.

When a propertya homeowner makes decisionsdecidings prior to death it lets the owner believethink of the recipients desires. It may also indicate fewer misconceptions about the owners desires. When people don’t prepare prior to their fatality, there are a limited variety of choices for dispersing their home. Whatever method is used, it is importantis essential to understand the potential effects of each.

Distribution approaches that require planning prior to death consist of gifting before fatality, preparing a list of who is to get which products after your death, and making a will. Gifting before fatality is the most certain method to make certain items go to the desired recipients. While Illinois law does acknowledge a dated, signed list of personal propertypersonal effects with the intended recipients identified, attorneys commonly advise you also note those products in your will. At a minimum, your will certainly should include the statement that a list has actually been prepared and it is the givers want that distribution be made according to the list.

Another distribution method is to offer the non-titled home. Auctions and other typessorts of sales can be held either within the household or for the basicpublic. Another method is an in-family circulation making use of some sort of selection, such as a lotto.

The transfer of non-titled home is a concern that can affect all people and households despite their monetary worth or the amount of home to be distributed. Curtailing and moving personal property, while unavoidable, is a situation for which few people plan and this is typically the reason for family disputes. Nevertheless, there may be fewer disputes when they understand the sensitivity of the concern, decide exactly what fair methods to their family and consider different circulation options. A potentially difficult and adverse circumstance can become a time to commemorate the past and bond as a household. This can especially be truehold true when you share the story behind your items or the familyfamily tree of the household heirloom.

This post is adapted from the lesson, Who Gets Grandmas Yellow Pie Plate, written by fellow University of Illinois Household Life Educators. For more details on household life-related topics see our local University of Illinois Extension website http://web.extension.illinois.edu/cfiv/ or contact Chelsey Byers at 217-333-7672 or at [email protected]

Identiv Appoints Jim Ousley To Board Of Directors

FREMONT, Calif., July 16, 2014 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE)– Identiv (Nasdaq: INVE), a worldwide security technology company that provides trust options for properties, info, and daily items, today announced that James Jim Ousley is joining its board of directors as of July 31, 2014.

Jim has extraordinary innovation and company competence and we are delighted that he is signing up with Identivs board of directors, said Jason Hart, Identiv CEO.

We anticipate gaining from Jims wealth of experience in SaaS, cloud computing, and structure strategic collaborations, along with his understandings from running an international services business and serving on several public company boards, said Steve Humphreys, Chairman of the Board.

Jim Ousley has even more than 40 years of experience leading worldwide innovation and telecommunications organizations. On July 1, 2014, he joined CVC Development Capital as senior operating handling partner. Formerly, he worked as the main executive officer at Savvis Inc. from March 2010 to April 2013. Savvis was obtained by CenturyLink, where he worked as chief executive officer of Savvis and president of Venture Markets Group, which is now CenturyLink Technology Solutions, an international leader in cloud and managed solutions.

I am thrilled to be signing up with the Identiv board and working with this remarkable team, said Jim Ousley. We reside in an increasingly connected world where everything requireshas to be trusted. Identiv is showing strong management with their Trust Solutions vision and I look forward to contributing my own experiences.

Prior to Savvis, Ousley served as president and primary executive officer of Vytek Wireless, Inc., which was obtained by Calamp, Inc.; president and chairman of Syntegra (USA), a division of British Telecommunications Plc.; and president and primary executive officer of Control Data Systems, which was gotten by British Telecommunications. He has actually likewise held different executive management positions with Control Data Corporation. Ousley presently serves on the board of directors of Icelero, Inc., Integra, Inc., Datalink, Inc., and Pacnet, Inc., and formerly served on the board of directors of Savvis, Inc., Actividentity Corporation, Control Data Systems, Inc., Peak10, Bell Microproducts, Inc., and other technology and network companies.

In addition to Ousley, Identivs board consists of Steven Humphreys, Identiv chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Flywheel Software; Jason Hart, Identiv CEO; Saad Alazem, CEO and co-founder of Alazem for Financial Consulting; Gary Kremen, founder of Match.com and managing partner of Cross Coin Ventures; and Daniel S. Wenzel, creator and managing partner at Mountain Partners Group.

I would likewise likeprefer to thank Larry Midland, Phil Libin, and Hans Liebler for their years of service on the board, Hart added.

About Identiv

Identiv is a worldwide security technology company that establishes trust in the linked world, consisting of premises, info, and daily products. CIOs, CSOs, and product departments rely upon Identivs trust options to decrease risk, achieve compliance, and shield brand name identification. Identivs trust options are implemented utilizing standards-driven products and technology, such as digital certifications, mobility, and cloud services. For even more information, see identiv.com.

CONTACT: Identiv Media Contacts:.
Lesley Sullivan/Joann Wardrip.
MSLGROUP.
781-684-0770.
[email protected]

(C) Copyright 2014 GlobeNewswire, Inc. All rights booked.

Are Trip Share Solutions Curbing Drunk Driving?

Business linking riders with motorists may be to thank for a recent reduction in driving under the influence in Philadelphia.

  • Man Charged in Murder of College Graduate

A local tech officer, Nate Good, took a look at information from Philadelphias Uniform Criminal offense Reporting system and discovered a reduction in reports of individuals driving under the impact in the city. The decrease in DUIs correspondedaccompanied the intro of trip share services like Uber and Side Automobile.

According to Product analysis of the data, the typical variety of DUIs per month in Philadelphia decreased by 11 percent in between April and December, 2013; the variety of DUIs amongst motorists under 30 saw an even greater reduction of 18.5 percent.

3 major ride share services, Uber Black, Side Car, and UberX had actually begun running in the city throughout the same months. The companies offer innovation that allows riders to demand and pay for transportation making use of cellular phone applications.

  • Gang Employees Prospective Police officer Killers: Memo

A spokesman for Uber, Taylor Bennett, said a decrease in drunk driving in cities throughout the country is an unintentional but welcomed benefit of the business ride share services.

Uber started truly just to link riders and drivers. A by-product of that, as weve seen, are these incredible social and economic effects that were seeing in different cities, he stated.

Its a very smooth and practical way to get transportation on need. You don’t need to go stand on a corner at two in the morning awaiting a taxi and fumbling around for money.

  • 2 Teenagers Struck in Rec Center

Bennett suggested that ride share services may also contribute to a reduction in taxi cab related crimes and robberies.

Earlier this month, Uber introduced a project with Mothers Versus Dui (MADD). With the partnership, Uber will donate $1 to MADD for each ride taken with the company in an effort to prevent drunk driving.

Ubers CEO Travis Kalanick said the business services directly added to a decrease in dui in Seattle.

  • Donors Prepare Caskets for Gesner Street Victims

For years we have heard anecdotally that riders relycount on Uber rather of drinking and driving and now were able to measure the effect that choice has on DUI rates, Kalanick stated in a current news release.

Our analysis in Seattle shows a 10-percent decrease in DUI rates because Uber went into the marketplace, and we are thrilled for the means this partnership will certainly remain to spreadget the word out about the value of making a safe selection and taking Uber.

MADD National President Jan Withers mentioned Uber as an easy, trustworthy and budget-friendly alternative to driving impaired.

Uber plans to release an analysis of the business impact on driving under the influence in Philly later on today.